My Learnings

 After the 1857 revolt, Indian Muslims faced political collapse and an identity crisis. Two major responses emerged: Deoband’s traditional revivalism and Sir Syed Ahmad Khan’s modernist reform. Both sought Muslim survival, yet followed opposite logics — one rooted in preservation, the other in adaptation. 1. Competing Visions Deoband believed strength lay in religious continuity: preserving Qur’anic learning, Arabic scholarship, and moral discipline would protect Muslims from Western secularization. Sir Syed argued that only modern education and integration into British institutions could lift Muslims from decline; theology had to evolve with reason and science. Each side captured one half of a complete solution — faith versus function. 2. Historical Outcomes Deoband’s legacy produced an extraordinary network of madarsas across South Asia and beyond. It maintained Islamic learning, spiritual ethics, and community identity through colonialism and independence. Yet, its insulation fr...

For centuries, the Islamic worldview provided a cohesive moral and intellectual framework that propelled civilization forward. It offered not just spiritual solace but a robust system of ethics, law, and scientific inquiry. Today, however, many Muslim societies find themselves at an intellectual impasse, where faith is often experienced as a rigid set of prohibitions rather than a dynamic source of enlightenment. The issue is not faith itself, but a prevailing culture that discourages critical engagement with it. To unlock our potential, we must relearn the art of questioning—not as an act of defiance, but as a profound religious and intellectual duty. Let’s examine the roots of our strength and the architecture of our current limitations. 🌙 The Unfulfilled Promise: Faith as a Dynamic Force The reduction of Islam to ritual and legalism obscures its deeper, empowering essence. The Foundational Imperative of Ijtihad: The "great closing of the gates of Ijtihad" is a historical ...

When news surfaced that an Afghan minister associated with the Taliban had visited Darul Uloom Deoband — and that the seminary appeared pleased with the occasion — reactions in India were mixed. For many observers, it raised uncomfortable questions about the relationship between one of India’s most respected Islamic seminaries and a regime that has become a global symbol of oppression and extremism. The issue isn’t merely about who visited whom. It’s about what such gestures represent — morally, ideologically, and politically — in a world where symbolism often outweighs explanation. The Historical Context Darul Uloom Deoband, founded in 1866 in Uttar Pradesh, is one of the most influential Islamic seminaries in the world. Its teachings inspired the Deobandi movement, which spread across South Asia and emphasized scholarship, simplicity, and a return to core Islamic principles. However, the same Deobandi tradition also shaped many madrasas in Pakistan and Afghanistan, from which the Tal...

For centuries, Muslims have been taught that riba—often equated with interest—is categorically forbidden in Islam. The Qur’an’s language against it is uncompromising. Yet one must ask:  Is the “interest” of modern finance truly the riba condemned in the Qur’an? Or have we inherited an understanding that may have drifted away from the original context and ethical intent? 🌾 The Historical Context of Riba In pre-Islamic Arabia, credit was personal and informal. The poor often borrowed from the wealthy, not to invest but to survive. If a borrower failed to repay on time, the lender would extend the deadline—with an increase. This repeated cycle led to the infamous practice of “doubling and redoubling” the debt (riba al-jāhiliyyah). The Qur’an directly condemned this system:  “O you who believe, do not consume riba, doubled and multiplied, but fear Allah so that you may be successful.” — Surah Āl ʿImrān 3:130 This was not a prohibition of all financial gain, but of oppressive usur...

If you’ve ever wondered how certain political or cultural ideas suddenly become “normal” — ideas that once seemed extreme or taboo — you’re thinking about what social scientists call the Overton Window. It’s the range of opinions that society currently considers acceptable. Anything outside it is dismissed as “radical” or “unthinkable.” In India, few subjects illustrate this shift as dramatically as religious identity. From the secular ideal of the 1950s to the openly faith-infused politics of today, the country’s Overton Window has been on a long and fascinating journey. 🇮🇳 From Secular Foundations to Cultural Assertion At independence, India’s founding vision — shaped by Nehru and Ambedkar — placed secularism at its core. Religion was respected, but politics was meant to remain neutral. The idea of mixing faith and statecraft was largely outside the window, associated with the trauma of Partition. By the 1980s and 1990s, this began to change. The Ayodhya movement, media liberalizat...

 Core Idea: Radical Candor is the ability to care personally while also challenging directly. This balance creates a workplace culture where honest feedback leads to growth, better relationships, and more effective collaboration. Key Insights: 1. Trust Comes First: People are more open to both praise and criticism when they trust you and believe you care about them. Honest communication flourishes in a culture of care, not fear. 2. Suppressing Emotions Kills Engagement: When employees hide their true selves and emotions, motivation drops. Encouraging people to bring their whole selves to work leads to more authentic and engaged teams. 3. Caring Personally Is Not Soft—It’s Real Leadership: Don’t confuse professionalism with emotional detachment. Some bosses wrongly believe they're superior to their teams. This damages relationships and creates toxic workplaces. Being a boss is a responsibility, not a badge of superiority. 4. Create a Culture of Feedback: Invite people to challenge y...