The “How” of Radical Islam: A Political, Not Religious, Story

Introduction

Radical Islam is often misunderstood as a purely religious phenomenon rooted in ancient beliefs. But extensive research by scholars like Gilles Kepel, Olivier Roy, and Fawaz Gerges shows that its rise is modern, political, and deeply tied to state failures, wars, and geopolitical struggles.


This blog explains how radical Islamist movements emerged and why they cannot be understood without understanding politics.


1. Failure of Secular Arab Regimes (1960s–1980s)


After the 1950s, many Muslim-majority countries adopted:


Arab nationalism


Socialism


Secular military rule


People expected development and dignity, but instead saw:


corruption


authoritarianism


economic decline


military defeat (especially the 1967 Six-Day War)


As Gilles Kepel notes in The Roots of Radical Islam (2005), these failures discredited secular ideologies and opened the door for Islamist opposition movements.


Key insight: Radical Islam grew from political disappointment, not religious revival.


2. The Cold War Internationalized Islamist Militancy


During the 1970s–1980s, the Middle East and South Asia became Cold War battlegrounds.

Superpowers used religion for political ends:

The U.S. and Saudi Arabia funded Islamist groups to fight Soviet influence


The USSR backed secular dictators who repressed Islamists


Dictators used Islamic symbolism for political legitimacy


This culminated in the Afghan jihad (1979–1989).

According to Fawaz Gerges (The Far Enemy, 2005), this era forged the global jihadist mindset and networks later used by al-Qaeda.


Key insight: Radical networks were born in war, not scripture.


3. Saudi Oil Money and Global Salafi Expansion


After the 1970s oil boom, Saudi Arabia spent billions spreading a strict Salafi ideology worldwide.


Kepel explains that this mass ideological export created a rigid religious environment that later militant groups weaponized, even though most Salafis are peaceful.


Key insight: State-funded ideological projects created ideological soil for later extremist offshoots.


4. Social and Economic Breakdown Fueled Extremism


Scholars like Olivier Roy (The Failure of Political Islam, 1994) argue that radical Islam grows strongest where:


states fail


youth face unemployment


justice systems collapse


corruption is rampant


identity crises deepen


Extremism becomes a psychological refuge for the marginalized, not a religious awakening.


Key insight: Radicalism is a social crisis, not a theological movement.


5. Foreign Interventions Radicalized Populations Further


From Iraq to Syria to Libya, wars and regime collapses made fertile ground for militant groups.


Lawrence Wright’s Pulitzer-winning book The Looming Tower (2006) highlights how:


the Iraq War dismantled state institutions


sectarian militias formed


foreign fighters poured in


radical groups filled the power vacuum



Similarly, ISIS rose directly from:


the post-2003 destruction of Iraq


disbanded Iraqi military officers


chaos in Syria


Key insight: Radical Islam expanded in zones of war and state collapse.


6. The Internet & Social Media Created a Global Pipeline


Modern extremist movements were transformed by digital tools.


According to Peter Bergen (The Osama bin Laden I Know, 2006), online propaganda became more powerful than physical training camps in recruiting new extremists.


This created:


lone-wolf attacks


self-radicalized youth


global extremist identity



Key insight: The online world replaced traditional religious authorities with extremist influencers.



Conclusion: Radical Islam Is a Political Phenomenon


Across all major studies, scholars agree on one message:

Radical Islam is not a product of Islam.


It is a product of politics.


Its rise is tied to:


geopolitical conflicts


failed governance


social collapse


foreign interventions


identity crises



Religion provides language, not cause.


Only by addressing political roots can extremism be understood or countered.


Key Scholarly References:

Primary Works


1. Gilles Kepel – The Roots of Radical Islam (2005)



2. Gilles Kepel – Jihad: The Trail of Political Islam (2002)


Comparative Scholars


3. Olivier Roy – The Failure of Political Islam (1994)


4. Olivier Roy – Globalized Islam: The Search for a New Ummah (2004) Jihad Movement Analysis


5. Fawaz A. Gerges – The Far Enemy: Why Jihad Went Global (2005)



6. Fawaz A. Gerges – ISIS: A History (2016)

Historical / Narrative Works


7. Lawrence Wright – The Looming Tower: Al-Qaeda and the Road to 9/11 (2006)



8. Peter Bergen – The Osama bin Laden I Know (2006)

Social Factors


9. Mark Sageman – Understanding Terror Networks (2004)


10. Jessica Stern – Terror in the Name of God (2003)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Future of India’s Overton Window on Religious Identity

If you’ve ever wondered how certain political or cultural ideas suddenly become “normal” — ideas that once seemed extreme or taboo — you’re thinking about what social scientists call the Overton Window. It’s the range of opinions that society currently considers acceptable. Anything outside it is dismissed as “radical” or “unthinkable.” In India, few subjects illustrate this shift as dramatically as religious identity. From the secular ideal of the 1950s to the openly faith-infused politics of today, the country’s Overton Window has been on a long and fascinating journey. 🇮🇳 From Secular Foundations to Cultural Assertion At independence, India’s founding vision — shaped by Nehru and Ambedkar — placed secularism at its core. Religion was respected, but politics was meant to remain neutral. The idea of mixing faith and statecraft was largely outside the window, associated with the trauma of Partition. By the 1980s and 1990s, this began to change. The Ayodhya movement, media liberalizat...
Read more

When Rules Divide: The Unseen Wall Between Letter and Spirit

I see it everywhere. In the anxious whisper of a friend wondering if their food is zabihah enough. In the swift, judgmental glance towards someone whose hijab doesn’t meet an unwritten standard. In the quiet exclusion of those who are deemed "not religious enough" because their practice looks different. This isn't an essay about one specific Islamic ruling. This is about a sickness of the heart that can sometimes infect our communities—a sickness born from a dangerous misunderstanding. It’s the belief that faith is a fortress to be defended with rigid rules, rather than a garden to be nurtured with compassion. We have become so skilled at following the letter of the law that we have, at times, forgotten its spirit. And in doing so, we are building invisible walls between ourselves and the very people we are meant to connect with: our fellow Muslims, and our fellow human beings. The Goodness of the Rule, The Danger of the Lens Let’s be clear. The rules—the ahkam—are not th...
Read more

Have We Misunderstood What Islam Forbade as Interest?

For centuries, Muslims have been taught that riba—often equated with interest—is categorically forbidden in Islam. The Qur’an’s language against it is uncompromising. Yet one must ask:  Is the “interest” of modern finance truly the riba condemned in the Qur’an? Or have we inherited an understanding that may have drifted away from the original context and ethical intent? 🌾 The Historical Context of Riba In pre-Islamic Arabia, credit was personal and informal. The poor often borrowed from the wealthy, not to invest but to survive. If a borrower failed to repay on time, the lender would extend the deadline—with an increase. This repeated cycle led to the infamous practice of “doubling and redoubling” the debt (riba al-jāhiliyyah). The Qur’an directly condemned this system:  “O you who believe, do not consume riba, doubled and multiplied, but fear Allah so that you may be successful.” — Surah Āl ʿImrān 3:130 This was not a prohibition of all financial gain, but of oppressive usur...
Read more